UKRAINIAN AGRARIANISM OF THE PERIOD OF THE UKRAINIAN REVOLUTION OF 1917–1921 IN INTELLECTUAL HERITAGE OF G. SIMANTSIV

Анотація

Economics in Czechoslovakia in 1922Czechoslovakia in -1935 6 6 ; artistic, cultural and social life of the Ukrainian emigration in interwar Czechoslovakia 7 , etc.At the same time, in our opinion, it is important to study the intellectual Ukrainian product in exile.First of all, the further theoretical development of such a European peasant-centric phenomenon of the second half of the nineteenth century -1930s, as agrarianism, represented, in particular, by Ukrainian agrarianism.In this context, it is scientifically sound to turn to the intellectual heritage of G. Simantsiv.It is about his speech "The Newest Agrarianism", delivered in the Ukrainian Academic Community in Podebrady and in the Republican-Democratic Club in Prague in 1929.The author of the article aims to explore the intellectual heritage of G. Simantsiv, presented in his report "The Newest Agrarianism", to reveal the content of Ukrainian agrarianism of the interwar period. The essence of agrarianismCompositionally, the speech consists of three parts: sociological foundations; socio-political system; results.They set out the author's understanding of modern Ukrainian agrarianism, its content and essence, the characteristic features that distinguish it from other socio-political ideologies and practices.In the 1920's and 1930's in such European countries as Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, etc., a common peasant-centric phenomenon, the state doctrine was agrarianism.He was represented by political parties and organizations, government circles.The ideas of agrarianism were the basis of agrarian reforms in these countries, their social basis was the peasantrythe largest number of agro-industrial countries in Central and South-Eastern Europe.At the same time, the ideas of socialism were no less popular in the socio-political life of Europe at that time.Between agrarianism and socialism, their theorists and supporters, there was competition, discussion, and so on.G. Simantsiv as a representative of Ukrainian agrarianism reasonably argued the separation of agrarianism from socialism.He emphasized that agrarianism and socialism were different political phenomena, as were the peasantry and the working class, which were the social basis of agrarianism and socialism, respectively 8 .In the 6 Уткін О. Вища аграрна школа української еміграції (1922-1935 рр.).

Класифікація

Ідентифікатори

Схожі роботи