Individual, institutional, and collective authorization in the journal articles of The Economist and Time

Анотація

Introduction. Due to the view of semantic syntax, authorization is considered as a mandatory characteristic of a sentence, indicating the author, his statement, or assessment of reality [6, p. 263]. In the study of scientific discourse, authorization is interpreted as an integration pragmasemantic category, identifying the author as a linguistic personality and subject of cognition [2, p. 5]. The authorization is reflected by the communicative, pragmatic, metacommunicative, and evaluative components of the meaning and structure of the media discourse. The journal text is created by many participants in the communication process defining the specific feature of authorization. Sometimes the number of which reaches eight [15, p. 48], so as a result, the concept of the author as a linguistic personality is leveled to a certain extent. Media authorization reflects the degree of the author's manifestation, his statement or assessment when constructing reality and acts as a continuum that covers three main types of addressee: individual, presented like traditional varieties of discourse by an individual author [4, p. 12] that we find in the American news journal Time; collective, including a group of individuals that creates a text based on the division of labor [10, p. 169], circulated in Time journal; institutional, in which several authors "construct and support a certain social group" [18, p. 253], inherent in the British edition of The Economist, which submits articles without reference to the authors.

Класифікація

Ідентифікатори

Схожі роботи