In Regard to the History and Substantive Epistemology of the Categories of «Capitalism», «Liberalism», «Libertarianism»
Анотація
The article is aimed at implementing the correct interpretation of the specified concepts as categories of relevant theories, taking into account the history of their origin, dialectics of content and significance for social progress. The article presents the authors’ approach to the methodology (logic of cognition) of the part of economic theory, which is historically connected with the paradigm, ideology, doctrines of capitalism, as well as the historical dynamics of the processes of formation of the economic foundations of modern post-industrial civilization from the point of view of this theory. At this, such an economic theory is studied on the basis of the concepts and categories of «economic liberalism», «capitalism», «liberalism» and «libertarianism». The key provisions of the relevant theoretical postulates and their social interpretation, together with the consequences of social development in this case, are identified. The use of this allows to clearly identify functional factors (sources) and indicators of progress and efficiency of development models in the context of the main historically known economic theories. It is substantiated that, on this basis, management of development can be justly considered through manipulation of a set of indicators and limitations within a separate, virtually an engineering task, the expediency of which is determined through the dynamics of growth of development effects according to the libertarian model. It is concluded that modern society can be defined as a civilization, where the factor of economic freedom has historically received the greatest realization. Moreover, future progress is conditioned by the extent to which economic liberalism can be deepened in the future. And, accordingly, regression is determined by the extent to which economic liberalism will be limited on the course through the multitude of formally existing alternative conceptions, the essence of which is reduced to the ideas of regulation and flirting with the masses. This development dilemma is the main trend of possible scenarios.
Класифікація
Ідентифікатори
Рецензії (0)
Написати рецензіюРецензій ще немає. Будьте першим!
Схожі роботи
Conscientious War is the Leading Form of Geoeconomic Subordination of Consciousness as a New Subject of Labor in the Context of Neoliberal Globalization
Схоже за: Global Economic and Social Development · Economic Issues in Ukraine · Economic Development and Digital Transformation
TRANSFORMATION AS A SOCIO-ECONOMIC PHENOMENON
Схоже за: Global Economic and Social Development · Economic Issues in Ukraine · Economic Development and Digital Transformation
SPECIFICATION AND VERIFICATION OF THE ALTERGLOBALIZATION
Схоже за: Global Economic and Social Development · Economic Issues in Ukraine · Economic Development and Digital Transformation
The delegitimation of private property in utopian socialist doctrines of a new time
Схоже за: Global Economic and Social Development · Economic Issues in Ukraine · Economic Development and Digital Transformation
FIELDS AND LIMITS OF ECONOMIC HUMANISM
Схоже за: Global Economic and Social Development · Economic Issues in Ukraine · Economic Development and Digital Transformation
EVOLUTION OF DEVELOPMENT AND PECULIARITIES OF THE METHODOLOGY OF INSTITUTIONAL APPROACH TO STUDY OF SOCIAL LIFE
Схоже за: Global Economic and Social Development · Economic Issues in Ukraine · Economic Development and Digital Transformation