Тестовий режим. Платформа працює в режимі випробування: частина можливостей ще незавершена, дані можуть змінюватися, а окремі сторінки — виглядати або рахуватися неточно. Як читати показники · Якщо профіль стосується вас
SciNodus
СтаттяЗовнішня публікація

A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION DEVELOPMENT IN UKRAINIAN REGIONS

Наталя ІвановаORCID

Анотація

The accelerated progression of digital transformation processes has emerged as a strategic imperative for regional development, particularly in countries grappling with institutional, infrastructural, and security challenges. The objective of this study is to conduct a structural analysis of digital transformation development across Ukrainian regions, with a view to identifying typical regional groups and their digital characteristics. The study will use data from the national Digital Transformation Index. The impetus for this research stems from the necessity to enhance the governance capacities at the regional level and to formulate diversified digital policies that reflect the unique characteristics and developmental stages of subnational entities. The methodological framework combines cluster analysis based on a composite Digital Transformation Index with entropy-based validation and structural interpretation of clustering outcomes. The clustering procedure was executed by means of standardised subindex values reflecting institutional capacity, digital infrastructure, service digitalisation, human capital, and innovative initiatives. The results of the study indicate a marked disparity in digital maturity across different regions, thereby identifying three structurally distinct groups. The initial cluster encompasses regions characterised by inadequate digital readiness, infrastructural deficiencies, and institutional impediments, necessitating targeted foundational assistance. The second cluster comprises digital frontrunners, characterised by comprehensive integration of digital services, strong administrative capacity, and innovative local initiatives. The third cluster encompasses moderately advanced regions with potential for development yet facing challenges in digital innovation and strategic coherence. Each cluster exhibits a distinct internal digital profile, thereby calling into question the efficacy of uniform digital policies. The practical value of the study lies in providing a typology-based model for regional digital transformation policymaking. The approach advocated here is predicated on the premise that it facilitates data-driven decision-making, enables the prioritisation of interventions, and contributes to the reduction of digital inequality.

Класифікація

Ідентифікатори

Рецензій ще немає. Будьте першим!

Коментарі до статті

Коментарів ще немає

Увійдіть щоб залишити коментар

Схожі роботи