Тестовий режим. Платформа працює в режимі випробування: частина можливостей ще незавершена, дані можуть змінюватися, а окремі сторінки — виглядати або рахуватися неточно. Як читати показники · Якщо профіль стосується вас
SciNodus
СтаттяЗовнішня публікація🌐 Ukrainian

Digital profile of enterprises as a tool for financial management diagnostics: a methodological approach

Bohdana SHULIUKORCIDIvan Snihur

Анотація

Introduction. Digital transformation has become a central driver of change in enterprise financial management, shifting decision-making on resources, costs, revenues, and risks from retrospective reporting toward data-driven approaches. However, digitalization proceeds unevenly across industries, firm sizes, and individual enterprises, which simultaneously reflects and deepens differences in financial management capabilities. To describe this unevenness analytically, a model is needed that captures not just the level of digitalization but its structure – which digital tools are prevalent and what financial management relevance they carry. The purpose of the paper is to substantiate a methodological approach to the formation and assessment of the digital profile of enterprises in a financial management context based on official statistical data. Results. A classification framework of 11 indicators is developed, organized into four functional blocks – digital infrastructure, digital presence, digitalization of business processes, and analytical maturity – alongside two cross-cutting enabling components: digital security and digital human capital. Two aggregate components are proposed: Digital Operational Readiness (DOR) and Digital Management Capability (DMC). For Ukrainian enterprises, DOR equals 50.8% and DMC equals 12.0% – a gap of 38.8 pp (4.23 times). Compared to EU averages, Ukraine lags significantly in management tools: cloud services (15.9% vs. 52.7%), ERP (16.7% vs. 46.5%), website presence (38.7% vs. 79.0%), and AI (4.6% vs. 20.0%). Conclusions. Ukrainian enterprises are digitally present but not digitally managed. The proposed digital profile model fills a gap in existing approaches – unlike the EU Digital Intensity Index (DII), it characterizes the distribution of technologies across enterprise groups rather than individual firm intensity, and explicitly identifies enabling conditions that explain the self-reinforcing nature of the digital divide.

Класифікація

Ідентифікатори

Рецензій ще немає. Будьте першим!

Коментарі до статті

Коментарів ще немає

Увійдіть щоб залишити коментар

Схожі роботи

Digitalization of the fiscal and customs space for transparent attraction of foreign direct investment

Схоже за: Digital Transformation in Financial Services · Business and Economic Development · Banking, Crisis Management, COVID-19 Impact

THE IMPACT OF CRYPTO FRAUD ON THE DIGITAL ECONOMY: INCREASE IN LOSSES AND THE ROLE OF CYBERSECURITY IN RISK MINIMIZATION

Схоже за: Digital Transformation in Financial Services · Business and Economic Development · Banking, Crisis Management, COVID-19 Impact

Financial monitoring of virtual assets: international standards and challenges of implementation in Ukraine

Схоже за: Digital Transformation in Financial Services · Business and Economic Development · Banking, Crisis Management, COVID-19 Impact

ЗАСТОСУВАННЯ БЛОКЧЕЙН-ТЕХНОЛОГІЙ У ФІНАНСОВІЙ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ: ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ ТА ВИКЛИКИ

Схоже за: Digital Transformation in Financial Services · Business and Economic Development · Banking, Crisis Management, COVID-19 Impact

ПОВЕДІНКА ІНДЕКСІВ ФОНДУ ТА ЕКОНОМІЧНИХ ІНДИКАТОРІВ ЯК КРИЗОВІ ПРАПОРЦІ

Схоже за: Digital Transformation in Financial Services · Business and Economic Development · Banking, Crisis Management, COVID-19 Impact

Analysis of the implementation of E-Audit (SAF-T) and «E-Excise» as tools for the digital transformation of tax administration within the framework of Ukraine's National Revenue Strategy

Схоже за: Digital Transformation in Financial Services · Business and Economic Development · Banking, Crisis Management, COVID-19 Impact