Technological Innovation Efficiency in China: Dynamic Evaluation and Driving Factors
Анотація
Innovation is the engine and accelerator that drives high-quality economic and enterprise development. In recent years, the output of scientific and technological innovation in China has been high, but the phenomenon of low efficiency and low quality of innovation occurs frequently. In this study, first, technological innovation efficiency (TIE) was measured. Then, a dynamic evaluation and analysis of spatial-temporal characteristics of efficiency were performed. Lastly, the driving factors of innovation efficiency were explored. TIE was calculated dynamically in 30 provinces of China from 2011 to 2019 based on the improved super-efficiency SBM-DEA model. Then, the kernel density estimation method was adopted to analyse the spatial-temporal differentiation characteristics and dynamic evolution process of provincial efficiency. The findings confirm that from 2011 to 2019, the top five provinces for TIE in China were Beijing (1.0), Shanghai (0.96), Hainan (0.96), Jilin (0.94) and Tianjin (0.91). The provinces with lowest average efficiency were Qinghai (0.77), Ningxia (0.73) and Inner Mongolia (0.73). The significant differences in the level of technological innovation in different regions were caused by the long-term and in-depth implementation of the government’s strategy of revitalising science and driving innovation in parts of areas. The findings of kernel function confirm that the TIE in most parts of China was gradually polarised. Furthermore, the results show that for every 1 unit of government R&D funding support, the average marginal utility of the expected TIE will reach 0.192, which is more significant in the central and western regions. On this basis, combined with environmental factors of innovation market, infrastructure, financing and enterprise innovation potential, the article also extracts the driving factors that affect the differences in provincial efficiency. The findings provide a reference for guiding provinces to carry out innovation activities independently and improve innovation quality and efficiency.
Класифікація
Ідентифікатори
Рецензії (0)
Написати рецензіюРецензій ще немає. Будьте першим!
Схожі роботи
Unlocking Sustainable Value through Digital Transformation: An Examination of ESG Performance
Схоже за: Innovation Policy and R&D · Business and Economic Development · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
CHINA’S DIGITAL ECONOMY DEVELOPMENT: INCENTIVES AND CHALLENGES
Схоже за: Innovation Policy and R&D · Business and Economic Development · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
The Coupling and Coordination Degree of Digital Business and Digital Governance in the Context of Sustainable Development
Схоже за: Innovation Policy and R&D · Business and Economic Development · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Public R&D support, financial instruments, and energy start-up ecosystems in Europe: Evidence on non-linear and delayed effects
Схоже за: Innovation Policy and R&D · Business and Economic Development · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Measuring industry digital transformation with a composite indicator: A case study of the utility industry
Схоже за: Innovation Policy and R&D · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Structural and comparative analysis of R&D funding impact on the level of innovation development: The empirical evidence of GII’s leaders and Ukraine
Схоже за: Innovation Policy and R&D · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth