Тестовий режим. Платформа працює в режимі випробування: частина можливостей ще незавершена, дані можуть змінюватися, а окремі сторінки — виглядати або рахуватися неточно. Як читати показники · Якщо профіль стосується вас
SciNodus
СтаттяЗовнішня публікація

Modern transformational processes of the Ternopil district resettlement system

Mykhailo SaliiORCID

Анотація

The article examines the transformational changes that took place in the Ternopil inter-district resettlement system as a result of the administrative-territorial reform and its transformation into a district resettlement system based on the newly formed Ternopil district. An analysis of the spatial features of the district formation, which took place by unifying the territories of the former districts of the central part of the Ternopil region, was carried out. Ternopil district included the territories of eight former districts, six of which (Berezhanskyi, Zborivskyi, Kozivskyi, Ternopilskyi Pidvolochyskyi, and Pidgayetskii) were completely included in the newly formed district, and two more districts, Terebovlyanskyi and Zbarazhskyi, with the majority of settlements and former councils. Out of the settlements of the former Terebovlyan district, only four villages did not become part of the newly formed Ternopil district. Communities were analyzed by types, number of settlements, and united councils. It was established that 25 united territorial communities included 492 settlements and 280 former councils. It is also stated that there are 7 urban and village communities and 14 rural communities in Ternopil district by type. The positions of communities in terms of area, number and population density have been established. It was revealed that the largest in terms of area, population, and number of settlements and councils that have merged are communities whose administrative centers have become the centers of former districts. The urban population, in addition to the Ternopil urban community, also prevails in the Berezhansk and Velikobirkiv communities. For the purpose of visual display and analysis of the main transformational changes and spatial features of placement according to the main indicators, appropriate maps were created with the help of GIS. As a result, it was found that the most densely populated communities are located on the outskirts of the city of Ternopil, as well as along a line to the north and south of it. The Berezhansk urban community in the western part of the district stands out separately, with a population density of 111 people per km2, which is the third indicator among the district communities. It was also established that the least densely populated communities are located on the periphery of the district, especially in its southwestern part. Zolotnikivska, Saranchukivska and Narayivska communities with a population density of 27 to 31 per km2 occupy the last positions not only in the district but also in the region according to this indicator. Pidgayetska urban territorial community is the least densely populated among all urban communities of the region – 35 people per km2. Keywords: Ternopil region, district, settlement system, administrative system, decentralization, territorial community, city, village, GIS technologies, QGIS.

Класифікація

Ідентифікатори

Рецензій ще немає. Будьте першим!

Коментарі до статті

Коментарів ще немає

Увійдіть щоб залишити коментар

Схожі роботи