Тестовий режим. Платформа працює в режимі випробування: частина можливостей ще незавершена, дані можуть змінюватися, а окремі сторінки — виглядати або рахуватися неточно. Як читати показники · Якщо профіль стосується вас
SciNodus
СтаттяЗовнішня публікація🌐 українська

КЛАСТЕРИЗАЦІЯ КРАЇН У ГЛОБАЛЬНОМУ ЛАНДШАФТІ РОЗВИТКУ ЕКОНОМІКИ ЗНАНЬ

Maxim PolyakovORCIDGennadiy Yakovych ShevchenkoVladimir BilozubenkoORCID

Анотація

Urgency of the research stems from the need to analyse the complex transformation processes in the world economy system, associated with transition to knowledge economy (KE). Identifying the distinctive features of the countries at the national level is a key prerequisite for generalization of these processes at the global level. Target setting. In the context of changes in the world economy, an assessment of the level and dynamics of KE development parameters in general and by individual components is critical for every country. International comparative analysis allows assessing the global landscape of KE development as well as identifying its key factors. Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. Prominent Ukrainian and foreign scientists-economists formed the theoretic and methodological bases for the study. Numerous studies prove the relevance of the selected topic and significance of the identified scientific and practical problem. Uninvestigated parts of general matters defining. Global landscape of KE development has been studied in a fragmented manner. In particular, it is related to search for its structure and identification of the key factors of knowledge management. The research objective. To implement clastering of countries using KE development parameters and to identify its key factors. The statement of basic materials. Clustering of countries has been implemented using KE development parameters in 2010 and 2014, including such components as education, science, information and communication technologies, manufacturing technologies and innovative business. Based on the assessment of differences between clasters, we have identified the key factors of KE formation. Boundary values of these parameters by clusters enabled us to evaluate a position of Ukraine in the global landscape. Conclusions. Study outcomes characterize the structure and heterogeneity of the global landscape of KE development. We have identified its key factors, boundary values, which are critical while assessing a position of particular countries and identifying target indicators of their strategies.

Класифікація

Рецензій ще немає. Будьте першим!

Коментарі до статті

Коментарів ще немає

Увійдіть щоб залишити коментар

Схожі роботи