WORLD EXPERIENCE OF MANAGING THE RESOURCE PROVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNAL SERVICES OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES: ADAPTATION FOR UKRAINE

Анотація

The article examines the theoretical and applied aspects of managing the resource provision of housing and communal services of territorial communities in the conditions of modern challenges, in particular decentralization and military risks. Scientific approaches to determining the role of financial, material and technical, energy and personnel resources in ensuring the effective functioning of communal infrastructure are summarized. It was established that despite the expansion of the powers of territorial communities as a result of reforms, the system of communal property management and housing and communal services in Ukraine remains insufficiently effective and needs improvement. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the strategic directions for improving the system of managing the resource provision of housing and communal services of territorial communities of Ukraine based on the analysis and systematization of the best global practices. In the process of research, modern models of housing and communal services management in developed countries are considered, in particular public, delegated, privatized, corporate, regionalized, digital and environmentally oriented. Hybrid models that combine public management tools and market mechanisms have been proven to be the most effective. It is substantiated that increasing the efficiency of housing and communal services largely depends on the implementation of public-private partnership, digitalization of management, development of energy-efficient technologies and integration of resources within the concept of sustainable development. Special attention is paid to the analysis of financial instruments, in particular the use of infrastructure and «green» bonds, as well as mechanisms for ensuring the financial autonomy of utility companies. The key directions of adaptation of the European experience to Ukrainian realities have been determined, including decentralization of energy systems, increasing the energy independence of communities, implementation of smart technologies, development of participatory management and strengthening of stakeholder interaction. It is emphasized that in the conditions of war, the formation of sustainable housing and communal services systems capable of ensuring the continuity of service provision and rapid restoration of infrastructure is of priority importance. It was concluded that the effective management of housing and communal services resources of territorial communities is based on a complex combination of institutional, financial, technological and social tools, which ensures the improvement of the quality of life of the population and creates prerequisites for the sustainable development of territories. References: 1. Reshetilov G. (2022) Local economic development in territorial communities. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science Vol. 26, No. 1. DOI: 10.56407/2313-092X/2022-26(1)-7 2. Harmata Ye. (2024) Improving the Management of Communal Property of Territorial Communities in the Conditions of Local Self-government Reform in Ukraine. Public administartion aspects 12 (3). Рр. 5-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/152431 3. Korbutiak A., Lysenko Zh. Sokrovolska N., Oleksyn A., Yurii E. (2019) United territorial communities in Ukraine in the context of fiscal decentralization. Problems and Perspectives in Management, Volume 17, Issue 2. Pp.217-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.16 [in English] 4. Kamashev A. (2021) World Experience оf Territorial Communities Infrastructure Development. Modern Economics, №30, 102-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V30(2021)-16 [in English] 5. Bizonych D. (2021) European experience of housing reform and development: lessons for modern Ukraine. NUCZU. Vol. 1 (1) Pp. 129-144. DOI: 10.52363/passa-2021.1-13 6. Tymoshchyk L. (2021) Practical Approaches to Improving the Valuation of Territorial Communities Property. Modern Economics. №26, 147-151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V26(2021)-22 7. Södergren, K., & Palm, J. (2021). How Organization Models Impact the Governing of Industrial Symbiosis in Public Wastewater Management. An Explorative Study in Sweden. Water, 13, Article 824. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13060824 8. Daudova G., Piskunov R., Moskalenko O. (2025) Research on the conceptual foundations of innovative financing instruments for territorial communities’ infrastructure: green bonds. Financial and Сredit Systems: Prospects for Development. №4(19) P. 68-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2786-4995- 2025-4-06 9. Bokolo A. (2024) The Role of Community Engagement in Urban Innovation Towards the Co‑Creation of Smart Sustainable Cities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 15:1592–1624 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01176-1 10.Kaganovska, T., & Serohin, V. (2025). Multi-level governance: general theory and ways of implementation in Ukraine in the context of european integration. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Law, (39), 10-33. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1834-2025-39-01 11.Furlong K. (2015) Water and the entrepreneurial city: The territorial expansion of public utility companies from Colombia and the Netherlands. Geoforum Vol. 58, Pр. 195-207 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.008 12.Iveroth S. P., Johansson S., Brandt N. (2013) The potential of the infrastructural system of Hammarby Sjöstad in Stockholm, Sweden. Energy Policy. Vol. 59, Pр. 716-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.027

Класифікація

Ідентифікатори

Схожі роботи