State asset management in the context of Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction: strategic approaches

Анотація

Introduction. Destruction or damage to assets are everyday events that affect the national economy of Ukraine and the public sector in particular. To mitigate the consequences of military actions on public sector assets, privatization processes and corporatization of state-owned enterprises are being accelerated within the framework of European integration. At the same time, despite expectations, rapid changes in the restoration of state assets and increasing the efficiency of their management are not taking place. Problem Statement. Changes in legislation on reforming state asset management in light of Ukraine's accession to the EU and the requirements of post-war reconstruction have not yet had an obvious effect. The main reasons for this are various, but there are, firstly, a change in state administration priorities from economic to security during the war. The state must defend itself and almost all of its efforts and financial resources are directed at overcoming the military aggression of the Russian Federation. Secondly, despite economically justified strategic government decisions aimed at accelerating reforms in the field of state asset management, the mechanisms for their implementation have not been sufficiently developed and need to be improved. The purpose is to analyze the role of the state in managing the national economy, determine its impact on further improving the ways and mechanisms of managing state assets in the conditions of post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. Methods. General scientific methods were used: comparison, analysis, synthesis and generalization. Results. The initial hypothesis is proven: the presence of state assets in the country, their volume, structure, methodological and organizational principles of their management are determined by the economic and legal nature of state ownership, the functions of the state in managing the national economy and the urgent needs for its improvement. Consideration of the functions of the state and the institutions that perform them has proven their influence on the understanding of what state assets are, because they provide the material prerequisites for the existence of the state as a political and legal organization of society and at the same time the degree and limit of its influence on the national economy. The definition of approaches to the management of state assets is influenced by the difference in the economic nature of the assets, which is determined, on the one hand, in which segment of the public sector the entity operates, that is, whether it belongs to budgetary institutions or is a state commercial enterprise. Conclusions. The state sector of the economy is based on assets that embody, from an economic point of view, the material composition of capital owned by the state, and from a legal point of view, the composition of property that is state property. The state, as its own, is obliged to manage the assets that it owns or controls, that is, to exercise its right of ownership. The heterogeneity of the state sector, the presence in its structure, on the one hand, of the general state administration sector, and on the other, of state commercial enterprises, requires the use of different strategies and tactics for managing state capital or property.

Класифікація

Ідентифікатори

Схожі роботи